Joseph Caputo originally wrote this post for the Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI). Vector editor Nancy Fliesler contributed.
Stem cell scientists had what first appeared to be an easy win for regenerative medicine when they discovered mesenchymal stem cells several decades ago. These cells, found in the bone marrow, can give rise to bone, fat and muscle tissue, and have been used in hundreds of clinical trials for tissue repair.
Uses range from tissue protection in heart attack and stroke to immune modification in multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Unfortunately, the results of these trials have been underwhelming. One challenge is that these stem cells don’t stick around in the body long enough to benefit the patient.
But scientists at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) and Boston Children’s Hospital aren’t ready to give up. A research team led by Juan Melero-Martin, PhD, with surgical research fellow Ruei-Zeng Lin, PhD, recently found that transplanting mesenchymal stem cells along with blood vessel-forming cells, naturally found in the circulation, improves results. This co-transplantation keeps the mesenchymal stem cells alive longer in mice—up to a few weeks compared to hours—giving the mesenchymal stem cells sufficient time to display their full regenerative potential, generating new bone or fat tissue.
“We are losing mesenchymal stem cells very rapidly when we transplant them into the body, in part because we are not giving them what they need,” says Melero-Martin, an HSCI-affiliated faculty member at Boston Children’s and Harvard Medical School.
“In the body, these cells sit very close to the capillaries, constantly receiving signals from them, and even though this communication is broken when we isolate mesenchymal stem cells in a laboratory dish, they seem to be ok because we have learned how to feed them,” he says. “But when you put the mesenchymal stem cells back into the body, there is a period of time when they will not have this proximity to capillary cells, and they start to die; so including these blood vessel-forming cells from the very beginning of transplantation made a major difference.”
Harnessing cell-to-cell signals
Melero-Martin’s research has immediate translational implications, as current mesenchymal clinical trials don’t follow a co-transplantation procedure. He is already collaborating with Arin Greene, MD, in the Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery at Boston Children’s and co-author on the paper, to see if his discovery can help improve fat and bone grafts. However, giving patients two different types of cells, as opposed to just one, would require more time and experiments to determine safety and efficacy. Melero-Martin is seeking to identify the specific signals mesenchymal stem cells receive from the blood vessel-forming cells, in order to be able to mimic the signals without the cells themselves.
“Even though mesenchymal stem cells have been around for a while, I think there is still a lack of fundamental knowledge about communication between them and other cells in the body,” he says. “My lab is interested in understanding whether these cell-to-cell signals are different in each tissue of the body, and how to educate both blood vessel-forming and mesenchymal stem cells to co-ordinate tissue-specific regenerative responses.”
Drug delivery and more
Other HSCI researchers are studying mesenchymal stem cells as bioengineering tools to deliver therapeutics, which is possible because of the cell type’s unique ability to not trigger an immune response. Jeffrey Karp, PhD, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital has developed several methods to turn these cells into drug-delivery vehicles, so that after transplantation they can, for example, home in on swollen tissue and secrete anti-inflammatory compounds. And Khalid Shah, PhD, at Massachusetts General Hospital has designed a gel that holds mesenchymal stem cells in place so that they can expose brain tumors to cancer-killing herpes viruses.
“A lot of these applications have no real direct link with mesenchymal stem cells’ supposed function as progenitor cells,” Melero-Martin notes. “In our study, we went back to the collective ambition to use these cells as a way to regenerate tissues, so we are not in a position to say how that affects other uses that people are proposing.”